🔗 Share this article

It's Black History Month in the Britain, and it seems it’s time for a re-evaluation. Over the years, an event that began as a celebration and reminder of heritage, traditions and links between global Black communities, has adopted a commercial tone, broadening to incorporate gatherings where individuals of African heritage are remunerated to talk to Caucasian groups about hidden biases and active solidarity. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade sparked an increase in the industry of displaying cultural sensitivity. However, that period has concluded. The wave has reached its height, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what raising awareness is for.

The Origins of Black History Celebration

First commemorated in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was established in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by African American historian Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of commemoration and observance in the middle of February. Black History Month grew out of this campaign and was officially launched in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the US and Canada in the second month, but also in October in the UK, Deutschland, Éire and the Netherlands.

The month has transformed since its inception, placing less emphasis on the accounts of transatlantic enslavement and civil rights battles, and greater focus on prominent Black figures in government, the arts, and social movements, and broadly celebrating the input Black people have made to mold society. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most regularly observed, with lectures and artistic activities. But the method the observance is commemorated is a reflection of the contemporary political context. How it develops is a instructive case in how assimilation leads to dismantling: the restructuring of Black History Month has stymied the objective of it, which is to confront structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Jarring Moment

Little demonstrates how important it is to reconsider Black History Month better than the specific period in which it occurs this year. In the United Kingdom, a reemerging right-wing in the guise of the Reform party is leading the polls. In the summer we observed the largest far-right rally in the history of Britain. the Conservative leader, the African descendant in charge of the Tory party, is a firm opponent of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a position where a legislator feels empowered to declare that “not seeing any white faces” in parts of a city is a source of worry. Meanwhile, ultra-nationalist movements are surging in Europe as a whole.

In the United States, a colossal assault against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been brought, repeatedly with positive outcomes, to the top legal institutions of the nation. A drive to erase the history of people of color and experience from the archives is in progress. One of the political figure's initial presidential directives aimed at the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the renowned cultural organization, alleging that they of a “concerted and widespread effort to alter the country's historical narrative” by depicting the United States “as naturally discriminatory”.

In this context, the observance represents how insufficiently it can be impactful if it is confined to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or politically neutered festivities of contributions in the past, rather than confronting the realities of the present. It also demonstrates how its restricted time span means that it is separated from the wider consistent effort that is required. Denise Miller, a prof at a learning establishment, put it best when she expressed apprehension about the temporary “tokenism” of the celebration. “The difficulty with embracing a superficial method”, she wrote, “is that it frequently results in that Black History Month turns into a brief show rather than a agent of progress.”

---

Reevaluating, Not Abandoning

Establishing how to alter, change and broaden efforts for fair treatment and appreciation in such times of discouragement and concern is a difficult task. There is a inclination to just do away with events including Black History Month completely, thinking they are no longer suitable, or are vestiges of an period that has not worked.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the complete comprehensive structure and heritage of activism for racial justice – community-based BLM initiatives, inclusion and equity efforts, and indeed, including corporate presentations – form an framework that a lot of work has been invested in. It is there not just to decay as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, regresses), but to be a living breathing thing.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month look like? Well, first, it would be not just one concentrated month: something that is dispersed throughout the annual calendar (as various establishments are already commencing), parts of its content (particularly around prominent figures of color) integrated into school curriculums. It would also be a era that does not evade political issues, and leaves space for citizens, particularly youth, to air their fears and experiences. What value has basic knowledge of the history when it ignores the current situation of far-right rallies in the street? Institutions who observe it should not be pacified with the neutral terminology of “unconscious bias” and sensitivity to subtle slights, but challenged by the dangers that affect everyone if opposition to discrimination is not taken seriously. Briefly stated, Black History Month should be made up-to-date, pressing, and reactive. Maybe an entire name rebrand is necessary – Contemporary Black History Month.